Anyway, we've been through this before over at How Did We Get Into This Mess.
Here's a great piece by Kevin Gannon, including a copy of the original letter.
Here's a key tweet run by Eve Ewing.
This is absolutely offensive and shows a basic misunderstanding of both concepts. Disturbing. https://t.co/xOU4BGQ6gP— wikipedia brown (@eveewing) August 25, 2016
This morning, the Dean walked it back a bit, because the Dean has no authority over what the faculty do really.
My thoughts:The News Office released a general statement tonight regarding the email from Dean Ellison to incoming first-years: pic.twitter.com/lG1lcLEw9v— The Chicago Maroon (@ChicagoMaroon) August 26, 2016
1) Trigger warnings are not a threat to academic freedom.— David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) August 25, 2016
2) Racism in the classroom is.
https://t.co/JrhRzjl6lk
Elaboration.— David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) August 25, 2016
1) Trigger warnings are actually your friends as a teacher: https://t.co/jV4w1Q0S82
It's not that student speech requests aren't sometimes an issue, but they are way at the bottom of things that worry me. Here are two issues at the top:2) Most "trigger warnings" are actually just good teaching prepping students for challenging material. https://t.co/2xpt3578gc— David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) August 25, 2016
— David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) August 25, 2016
And of course it's really about power.4) Things that might limit one's ability to speak freely as a teacher:— David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) August 25, 2016
Adjunctification - https://t.co/GjOdXflT32
Here we go again.5) Student protests become tools for silencing when they are appropriated by politicians / admins / trustees. https://t.co/goKNEFe8aG— David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) August 25, 2016